<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://willsani.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://willsani.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on plesk and isapi_rewrite 3 by Will</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2008/11/13/plesk-isapi_rewrite3/comment-page-1/#comment-19927</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=354#comment-19927</guid>
		<description>You’re comparing apples to oranges. I’d like to remind you that Linux is open-source, which means the development process doesn’t require you to drink the Microsoft Cool aid.

Parallels as a company is already overwhelmed with their products. Adding a rewrite extension to their development would be detrimental. You should also consider that HeliconTech has been doing this for a long time so, why re-invent the wheel? We all know that Parallels wouldn’t be able to create a better extension.

It seems that your problem is the cost, which is understandable. If that case I would recommend that you stop using Windows and use Linux instead…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re comparing apples to oranges. I’d like to remind you that Linux is open-source, which means the development process doesn’t require you to drink the Microsoft Cool aid.</p>
<p>Parallels as a company is already overwhelmed with their products. Adding a rewrite extension to their development would be detrimental. You should also consider that HeliconTech has been doing this for a long time so, why re-invent the wheel? We all know that Parallels wouldn’t be able to create a better extension.</p>
<p>It seems that your problem is the cost, which is understandable. If that case I would recommend that you stop using Windows and use Linux instead…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on plesk and isapi_rewrite 3 by Will</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2008/11/13/plesk-isapi_rewrite3/comment-page-1/#comment-19926</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=354#comment-19926</guid>
		<description>Your service provider will have to do it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your service provider will have to do it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on plesk and isapi_rewrite 3 by Umit Akkaya</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2008/11/13/plesk-isapi_rewrite3/comment-page-1/#comment-19924</link>
		<dc:creator>Umit Akkaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=354#comment-19924</guid>
		<description>Hi Will;
I have reseller account with plesk 8.6, i look everywhere to install isapi filters but i cant find. How can i install ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Will;<br />
I have reseller account with plesk 8.6, i look everywhere to install isapi filters but i cant find. How can i install ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on outlook 2007 error 0x800CCC80 by Albert</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2008/04/09/outlook-2007-error-0x800ccc80/comment-page-1/#comment-19778</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/2008/04/09/outlook-2007-error-0x800ccc80/#comment-19778</guid>
		<description>Thanks, also works for upgrade to Outlook 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, also works for upgrade to Outlook 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XenServer hard code NIC parameters by Dave</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2009/12/29/xenserver-hard-code-nic-parameters/comment-page-1/#comment-19756</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=812#comment-19756</guid>
		<description>It would be really helpful to include the xe pif-param-remove equivilant to these commands
-Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be really helpful to include the xe pif-param-remove equivilant to these commands<br />
-Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XenServer 5.5 network performance woes by Will</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2010/02/09/xenserver-5-5-network-performance-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-19708</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=840#comment-19708</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I do not have a script to reverse the changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I do not have a script to reverse the changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XenServer 5.5 network performance woes by Jawid</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2010/02/09/xenserver-5-5-network-performance-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-19705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jawid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=840#comment-19705</guid>
		<description>Hi Mate, 

We have just done this on this on our server and it has worked like a charm. I am about to do this on a production platform that will do it for about 50 VMs and I am just thinking about a roll back just in case things go wrong. 

Do you have a script that will undo the changes that we make the script. Ie a reverse of the script above?

Thanks for all your help! Your script was a lifesaver!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mate, </p>
<p>We have just done this on this on our server and it has worked like a charm. I am about to do this on a production platform that will do it for about 50 VMs and I am just thinking about a roll back just in case things go wrong. </p>
<p>Do you have a script that will undo the changes that we make the script. Ie a reverse of the script above?</p>
<p>Thanks for all your help! Your script was a lifesaver!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on outlook 2007 error 0x800CCC80 by Melissa</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2008/04/09/outlook-2007-error-0x800ccc80/comment-page-1/#comment-19591</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/2008/04/09/outlook-2007-error-0x800ccc80/#comment-19591</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU SO MUCH!  This has been driving me crazy for hours!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU SO MUCH!  This has been driving me crazy for hours!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XenServer 5.5 network performance woes by Will</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2010/02/09/xenserver-5-5-network-performance-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-19541</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=840#comment-19541</guid>
		<description>Cool! Let us know how it turns out. Have you also updated to the latest version of XenServer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! Let us know how it turns out. Have you also updated to the latest version of XenServer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on XenServer 5.5 network performance woes by Pete</title>
		<link>http://willsani.com/2010/02/09/xenserver-5-5-network-performance-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-19540</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 07:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willsani.com/?p=840#comment-19540</guid>
		<description>Top script, this appears so far in addition to the 2003 regifx to have moved us from 1Mb/s to a very good 300 - 500 Mbits/s transfer speed will continue testing and let you know if we have any problems.  We are using a fibre connected SAN but appear to have the problem wiht the guesst machines transfers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top script, this appears so far in addition to the 2003 regifx to have moved us from 1Mb/s to a very good 300 &#8211; 500 Mbits/s transfer speed will continue testing and let you know if we have any problems.  We are using a fibre connected SAN but appear to have the problem wiht the guesst machines transfers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
